The Human Rights Without Water

It is a fundamental right of people to have access to drinking water. Unfortunately, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of Man has no plans to provide drinking water for the population. Based on the facts and figures from more than one billion of the world organization of the health of people in Third World countries, representing 20 percent of people without access to safe drinking water. Only 46% percent of people in Africa have access to drinking water. Sometimes, only twenty percent of the population in some countries, access to drinking water. 2.2 million deaths annually are caused by contaminated water. Not to mention the people, even animals and plants are not enough water.

Water must not be a commercial product such as a well-known multinational companies have been marketed and sold worldwide by the media. But the superior creature of its hegemony over natural resources has become established because of his greed. The wise men of the time was the water from the cruel grip of the authors released greed.The the UN Charter of Human Rights does not include access to drinking water in the list of fundamental rights of man!

Therefore, it was an activity that millions of dollars and not a state or a person appears in a mood to provide people with drinking water pure or impure, because the human being.

To ensure freedom, justice and equality of its citizens is the first duty of a state. These privileges to citizens of a state are the basic rights of man than we thought. A social satirist explained those rights by saying that the free citizens die of hunger or thirst, would not affect the state in their basic freedoms.

The common needs of the common lot of nature in abundance. Air and water are the main examples.Nature gave all the blessing of all creatures, unicellular organisms to human beings, without distinction of any kind or species.Many organizations worldwide to fight for UN force to include access to water in the list of fundamental rights of the people . [Read more...]

Patriarchal Societies Promote Women’S Rights’ Abuses

Patriarchal societies to promote women’s rights’ abuses

The world today is very different from what it was 50 years ago. It has changed, sometimes for better and sometimes worse. Places have changed and with them people too. In general, people today have greater acceptance and tolerance of others and are open to other cultures and experience of their staff. Human rights have evolved and are practiced throughout the world, which distinguish what is human, is unbearable. The unit was among the countries that are willing to help each other so that 192 countries are members of the United Nations with the hope of the world a safer and healthier for all. In recent decades, many countries have focused on maintaining equity in their people, whether the wealth gap between rich and poor or gender. The idea that men are the superior sex, has long been forgotten for many communities. Although many countries have more problems between men and women are patriarchal societies still exist and it is these companies that promote the abuse of women’s rights. ” [Read more...]

FCR: An Inhuman Law

 

In present world there are many communities that are passing their lives under inhuman laws in third world countries as well as in developing countries. Pakistan is also a country which in passing through the stages of development. The article regards an inhuman law which is applicable to the tribal people of FATA.

FATA stands for federally administrative tribal areas. On the boarder of Afghanistan and Pakistan there living Pukhtoon tribes in hilly areas which have lack of social development. There population is about fifty lakes now a day. According to the Constitution of Pakistan, article 247, Pakistani law is not applicable to the tribal built and FCR should be applicable to these areas.

As we discussed that FCR stands for frontier crimes regulation. Originally it is a British law which had applied to control the tribal people during colonial government. It has 64 articles and most of them are against basic human rights while government of Pakistan says that these are according to the cultural set up of tribal people

Some main points of FCR are as bellow that is against basic human rights.

According to the article 40 of FCR if any tribal commits any crime his whole tribe will be responsible for his wrong act and government can arrest any person of his tribe. So it is clear that it is against human rights because every person is responsible for his/her wrong act another concept is that in tribal culture if a person commit crime only his family supports him rather than his whole tribe so as Anthropological point of view FCR should be amend that tribal responsibility should be changed to family responsibility and government can arrest his other family members and not his other tribal.

Another point is that if any murder case happened near one’s home that person will be responsible for murder. It is clear that each government is responsible for the safety of all citizens and no citizen is responsible for the safety of other citizens so why should a government arrest a person for a not committed crime.

According to FCR tribal people have no right of appeal to any court in the country. They can solve their disputes under the authority of political administration of Pakistani government. So it is also against human rights because why a person can not go to court for his/her rights.

Another and last reason for the wrongness of FCR is that FATA is under the control of Pakistani government than why there is different law for people of one country.

We can suggest that Pakistani government should amend FCR in the context of present culture of tribal people and universal human rights.

 

Aftab Ahmad Mallagori

 

Khyber Agency




By: aftab ahmad khan mallagori