This article is dedicated to all women regardless of your nationality, educational, racial, socio-economic or cultural backgrounds. It is meant to salute you as an equal in every sense with men. It is written to remind you and also all men, that equality with men is your principal right as a woman. When a man respects a woman’s equality with him, he is actually respecting his own status as a man. The equality of women to men is the platform on which all other rights of a woman are based.
Equality with Man: The Principal Right of Woman is enshrined in the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/ instree/women/engl-wmn.html#cedaw). The topic of this article rests on a solid rock foundation of human rights (women rights) that was crafted, ratified and given accession after much debate and agreement. Abhinav Aima in Realizing Women’s Rights – Pragmatic Steps towards Immediate Goals (http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~aa342389/chi602ppr1.html), succinctly points out the need to educate men on the rights women. But why educate men on the rights of women?
Androcentrism
The answer to foregoing question is “Androcentrism”. How can we describe androcentrism in layman’s understanding? Androcentrism is the belief that the male (man) is the norm and that the woman is to be appraised by this norm. Another way to put it is that man is the centre of the universe (religiously, politically, economically, scientifically, socially, culturally, medically, legally, academically, technologically, and linguistically). Among all the fields that have been listed, the fields of Religion and Politics in themselves have sufficient power to enforce male norms and dominance over women in all other fields. Therefore we only briefly look at androcentrism in religion and politics. Let’s look at androcentrism in religion.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, in the Woman’s Bible said: “The Bible and the Church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of woman’s emancipation”. The Skeptic’s Annotated Bible (http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/women/long.html) gives numerous examples on androcentrism and the discrimination of women. To begin with God is described in male pronouns. Checkout this interesting site on: “Is God Male by Rich Deem”, (http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/male.html). The use of male pronouns is found generally among most religions. Besides religion, politics is another field where androcentrism is active. The dominance of women by men begins with religion in which even God is perceived as a male. The questions are why was God not perceived as a female? Why God can’t be perceived as a female? Androcentrism is also seen in politics.
Mick Leach in his The Politics of Masculinity: An overview of contemporary theory (http://www.xyonline.net/politicsofmasculinity.shtml) gives an excellent description of masculinity as a structural fact of male dominance over women. R. W. Connell in his “Masculinities and Masculinity Politics in World Society (http://irw.rutgers.edu/lectures/connelllecture.pdf) gives a more thorough analysis of the androcentrism in politics. But what clearly stands out in Connell’s article is that confirmation of the existence androcentrism while acknowledging the potential changes it might undergo due to global dynamics. Though there are exceptions now, generally in a male dominated politics, all subsequent legislations and policies naturally favors the male (men). Thus it is clear androcentrism dominates religion and politics which in turn gives blanket dominance over all other fields in human endeavor. And women are thus directly and indirectly dominated by men. All appraisals of women are thus subjected to male norms. So the education of men (males) about women’s rights is crucial as it is primarily the men that hold the power over the women. And educating the men (males) on the principal right of equality of women with men should begin in the area of gender stereotyping of women.
Gender Stereotyping of a Woman
Gender stereotyping of a woman are commonly shared beliefs in a society about a woman’s personality traits, abilities, and expected social behavior (gender roles). And in many instances these stereotypes are based again on “androcentrism”. Androcentrism can be found in many different work situations. Here is an example of it in the workplace. See how men and women are labeled for their behavior according to androcentrism.
Men’s Behavior Women’s Behavior
“He’s good on details. She’s picky.
He follows through. She doesn’t know when to quit.
He’s assertive. She’s pushy.
He stands firm. She’s rigid.
He’s a man of the world. She’s been around.
He’s not afraid to say what he thinks. She’s outspoken.
He’s Close-mouthed. She’s secretive.
He exercises authority. She’s power mad.
He climbed the ladder of success. She slept her way to the top
He’s a stern taskmaster. She’s difficult to work for.
(Weiten & Lloyd, 2006, p. 305)
As for Gender stereotyping of women, it begins in childhood with the giving of gender (female) – appropriate toys like Barbie dolls and cookery sets (Basow, 1992). During 1820 to 1860 there was a cult of true womanhood that stated that women should be appraised by the virtues of piety, purity, submissiveness and domesticity (Welter, 1978, p. 313). If you look at the list, submissiveness and domesticity is a direct promotion of values that needs submission to male norms. It was not just in the past but even now in the twenty-first century we can find domineering rules for woman like: 1) Women’s voice in terms of her volume and tone must be lower in the presence of men, 2) Certain venues that are legitimate for men are prohibited to women, 3) Certain roles and positions are banned to women. 4) Certain educational fields are off-limits to women. 5) A woman must walk behind a man. 6) A woman shall not question a man. 7) A woman must sit in a certain way in the presence of a man. It is due to this gender stereotyping of women has led to limited advancement in many fields which is now known as the glass ceiling situation.
Many rules that are meant to dominate women come in the form of legal, religious and cultural demands. There are four common sense questions which can be applied to assess any unreasonable demands that discriminate women. 1) Is it applicable only to women? 2) Is the legislator(s) of the rule willing to subject himself/herself to the same rule? 3) Does it create double standards for men and women? 4) Is there natural justice for women in the content, application and outcome of the demands or rules? The answers to the above questions will expose how reasonable or unreasonable the rules and demands are to you as a woman. Any rules or demands that fail to stand to these common sense questions create doubts about their credibility and their suitability for the wellbeing and welfare of you as a woman.
Rules and norms exist for the benefit of men and women. Men and women don’t exist for the benefit of rules and norms. When as a woman you find yourself in a servitude status to a rule, norm or demand of a particular society, entity or individual – it is called oppression. And it is up to you as a woman who is equal with man to decide whether you would continue to submit or seek redress even under duress. You must understand that there are still persons (men and women) in our society and in the world who believe and cherish equality and natural justice. And therefore as a woman you are not alone. While gender stereotyping of women is a cognitive element, sexism is the behavioral aspect of androcentrism as applied to women.
Sexism against Women
Sexism against women is the belief that a woman (by the gender of being a female) is inferior to men. The belief of inferiority of women to men is shown in the term “misogyny”, which describes the contempt that men display for women. As quoted above check out the interesting site called the Skeptic’s Annotated Bible: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/ women/ long.html. If you are a woman who considers yourself to be equal to man, will you accept the contempt that is highlighted in the Skeptic’s Annotated Bible? What about the entertainment industry?
Contempt for women is shown in the Hip-Hop culture. Ayanna in the article, the exploitation of women in the Hip-Hop culture (http://www.mysistahs.org/features/hiphop.htm), describes in vivid details the kind of contempt shown to women. What if we reverse the contempt that is shown for women in Hip-Hop by including in every hip-hop video in which there are many dancing men (surrounding one or two women) wearing not much more than a g-string, with the cameras focusing on their genitals. I wonder how many rappers like to be portrayed in that manner.
These are but two examples out of the numerous type of contempt that is shown to women. Equality with Man: The Principal Right of Woman as enshrined in the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women has certain provisions for women that needs pointing out. The more pertinent ones are:
Man is not the norm by which a woman is appraised. Both man and women are equals. A woman has the equal right of access to every human field of endeavor (legal, economic, social, cultural, religious, medical or academic) and to every resources without having to request or prove her right to have access to these fields or resources. A woman has the right to seek redress and can demand justice for any wrong that is done to her by men. A woman can expect and demand for equality in existing laws, regulations, customs and practices, which is their right by the convention of human and women’s right.
Equality is your principal right. According to McClelland (May 20 1917 – March 1998), men seek power to have control and be in charge either for personal or social reasons. If in the process you as a woman is discriminated, used, or abused, it is your principal right to seek redress and take charge of the same power to look after your interest. Equality is a woman’s principal right. It is your right.
By: Thesigan Nadarajan
Equality with Man: The Principal Right of Women
Human Rights Situation in Nigeria in the Eye of the International Community
That the International community considers human rights situation frightening in Nigeria even in the face of democracy currently being enjoyed in the nation is not surprising after all at least to key observers. If for anything, the Nigerian government has failed to put certain factors right so that its citizens can enjoy certain natural priorities and necessities of life available to mankind.
It is as a result of this development that amnesty international still scores the nation very low in this regard and believes that it may certainly take time before an improvement is recorded in the nation as far as human rights in Nigeria is concerned and only a very sincere leaders will bring about this. Criminal justice system in Nigeria is indeed nothing to write home about in Nigeria and this has taken a negative toll on the nation’s perceived promotion of human rights, and as they say only he who wears the shoes feels the pain, so we Nigerians know better.
Human rights is one area that I have always wanted to write about, maybe not to crave in the indulgence of the Nigerian government but to let the whole world know just how it is and what should be done for the simple reason that the Nigerian government know better than I do, after all, in any nation the government of that country is the most briefed and the case of Nigeria is not an exception.
I begin this write-up by establishing that as some of the most brilliant people ever made by God, Nigerians know their rights but have not enhanced it because there is no money, the people are extremely too poor to do this, so the government take advantage of this, the wealthy therefore assert their dominance over the poor thus extending the gap between the rich and the poor in the country. The Agencies of the government are the tools used to actualize this. Like the Bible puts it “money answereth all things.” Without money what can the righteous people of Nigeria do but watch and pray that they may not fall into temptation, and when temptation comes they nothing but plead their guiltless course, such is the way of life of Nigerians.
The Legal Aids Council in Nigeria at present is having about 91 lawyers in Nigeria and one is left to wonder how 91 free lawyers can serve about 150 million impoverished people of Nigeria including even our politicians who also love free things. I therefore conclude that Legal Aids Council does not exist in Nigeria, and since this happens a suspect simply walks his way into the prisons where he either gets sentenced or awaits trial. People cannot represent themselves in courts so they sometimes plead guilty to avoid money “wahala” as we put here.
This writer will not go into the area of people abuse of people’s rights in the country because it is a very long story. Police in Nigeria still extract confessional statements from suspects even in local and state police stations in the country according to transparency international. Need we state that this use of this very method is known to all no matter how we want to pretend about it? The difference is just that no one is visibly willing to delve into this area for the fear of incurring the wrath of the police. Bail in Nigeria is supposed to be free but the police still collect money before suspects are released and our government does nothing about it while this undermines the fundamental human rights of Nigerians, as pointed out earlier in this work, Nigerians have learnt to accept this as their fate because the resources to pursue the usual rigorous litigations in the Nigerian courts of law are lacking. The police station should have a place people freely walk in to acquire or give free information but in my country Nigeria, the fear of police stations is the beginning of wisdom.
The Bill in National Assembly on detention has been lying idle since 2006, with no one laying emphasis on it simply because it concerns the welfare of mostly the ordinary masses of the country. It is for this reason that I commend the efforts of the Lagos State Government which has decreed that anywhere in Lagos where the police are taking statements from suspects, camera must be present, and maybe in the presence of suspects lawyers too. This will no doubt reduce drastically the any fowl play on the part of the police and give individuals confidence in the police.
Again, our police stations must be computerized so that the challenges of the future as well as the present can be met with, files in police stations should be electronically documents and this must also be extended to our law courts to avoid the a “certain Mr. James Onanefe Ibori” saga where another court had to seat up to the highest level to determine who was convicted by same court with legal operational business in the country, which to me is a very funny development. Recently, the Economic and financial Crimes Commission reportedly announced that the files of Ex-governors standing trials were missing, only electronic propelled files can avoid this.
Corruption is one area Nigerians have not fared well either, corruption in Nigeria is systemic and Transparency methodology is clearly incapable of perceiving Nigeria according to Rev Iloh as reported in the Vanguard, 14 October 2008. Corruption bites hard in Nigeria. Religion has not helped Nigeria as millions troupe to churches and mosques yet transformations elude the country.
Obasanjo, the former president of the country invented the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) an idea which for the first time created the fear of looting the nation’s treasury for the first time but we did not see the Commission function up to the average as jail sentences handed down to convicts were rather amusing and senseless. A big fish who stole the nation’s money in billions only end up serving between two and three months jail sentence while a frustrated unemployed youth who snatches a 3310 nokia phone goes in to serve three years imprisonment usually after spending more than 2 years in detention perhaps with his file missing.
The news of people in high places in Nigeria who steal in billions and are never convicted at all but faced with unending trials often encourage the youth to work hard and steal some monies too in dollars go to jail return and enjoy these monies. What kind of societies is our government building?
Prison conditions in Nigeria is not different as people waiting to be executed stay in detention for between 7-9 years according to Transparency International, again need we deny this fact? Several cases will establish this fact to the extent that one of your friends or relatives may have been a victim now or in the past. Prisons should be rehabilitation centers and not punishment rooms where correctional forms of reforms should be carried out. This was at its height in decades of military rule in Nigeria where the regimes had hoped to teach civilians as well as khaki men hard lessons.
Interestingly many of the once victims of this ugly developments when freed and returned to fruitful positions especially in this present democratic dispensation forgot their ugly experiences to the neglect of the bad prison conditions and continued life as usual, unmindful of Ibusa people in Delta State of the country’s adage that “the broom used in sweeping out the first wife is waiting for the second wife.” A situation which connotes our prisons as places where criminals visit and return to become harder and even more dangerous to the communities must be avoided.
The Nigerian government should do something today to make the Nigerian society more meaningful and useful to the international community. Nigerians certainly are not the worst rogues as characterized by the outside world, however only a good promotion of the social development of the society will return to the lost glory to the nation and greatly advance our society.
By: Emeka Esogbue