What I say will probably shock and offend many readers, often unpleasant facts. I say on the following pages are the following very simple and I’ll show you undeniable points:

1st Psychology (and psychiatry) is not a science;

2nd The New Zealand legal system and many other base many decisions on family law, mental health and criminal justice in the opinion of the so called experts in psychology – which inevitably leads to mistakes court because the argument that it can not be experts in this field, since it is not corresponds to a science, then – expertise in this area or just the recognition experts in alchemy occult magic. The adoption of opinions as psychological and psychiatric is also a matter of logic, in many cases, a violation of the rules of the High Court on the expert report. My conclusion that the judiciary is eroded by “psychologically”.

Before the start of a discussion of all proposals, I would say to be heard on the powers of the Consultative Council and me, so I can enjoy each at least entitled to such notice.

CCHR (Citizens Commission on Human Rights) was established as an international watchdog to expose abuses of psychology and psychiatry in the world. Its members include prominent judges and lawyers for human rights in the world, and one of its founding members Szazz Professor, emeritus professor of psychology and a world authority on the history and the abuse of psychiatry and psychology. CCHR has exposed abuses in psychiatry in many countries led to the Congress inquiries, investigations, class actions and exposure of human rights violations. In Australia, their work has in the detection of cases of Chelmsford deep sleep therapy, which caused the death of many patients is crucial, and New Zealand, they have highlighted the Lake Alice mental hospital.

My credentials a degree in psychology with an interest of the whole object, a degree in philosophy (focusing on the study of psychology and psychoanalysis and the philosophy of mind), Diploma (several) in the legislation and legal practice of human rights.

Let me start by Proposition 1st Before I begin, I would repeat what I will be very “politically correct” and therefore offensive to many people who say working in the area. This is because, historically, and indeed, the psychology and the law are so intertwined that they are involved in virtually the same system and therefore on the “political correctness” defined. Therefore, the statements are made on, as shocking as a pig ear to throw in a mosque or tell the Inquisition does not exist as witches. I use the symbols because we jump into the domain of religion, not science. Psychology is literally the study of the soul “, so I started here a rapid advance in the story, because as the saying goes” those who do not know, their history are condemned to repeat it. ”
[Read more...]